Scientific curation portfolio · Infection biology · AMR

Structured
scientific
curation
for research
that matters.

Clear, traceable, and decision-oriented evidence work for researchers who need existing literature to be organized, interpreted rigorously, and reused more efficiently.

Field synthesis Evidence appraisal Deep article extraction
Best for MSc students, PhD researchers, and small labs
Focus Infection biology, AMR, host–pathogen questions
What you get Readable, reusable, portfolio-grade scientific outputs

How to work with me

You send the topic, paper or paper set, goal, and deadline.

  • Single paper → best for a Structured Evidence Dossier
  • Several papers → best for a Comparative Appraisal Summary
  • Broad topic or literature set → best for a Scientific Landscape Analysis
If needed, additional formats are available on request.
01 Landscape synthesis
02 Methodological appraisal
03 Expanded PICO dossiers
Infection biology Antimicrobial resistance Host–pathogen interactions Biomedical evidence synthesis

Sample formats

Three flagship formats.

This portfolio is intentionally centered on the three outputs that best represent how I work: field-level synthesis, methodological appraisal, and deep single-paper evidence extraction.

Reliability

Comparative Appraisal Summary

Structured comparison of studies or evidence claims, with attention to methodological quality, interpretive strength, and confidence boundaries.

  • Best for judging evidence quality
  • Useful before larger review or discussion work
  • Strong mid-tier research format
Open sample

Deep extraction

Structured Evidence Dossier

Deep structured analysis of a single paper or focused scientific question, using an expanded evidence-extraction approach.

  • Best for one paper or one focused question
  • Useful for review groundwork and evidence tracking
  • Strong entry format for first clients
Open sample

What this work is for

Not more papers. Better use of the papers you already have.

01

Understand the field

Clarify what is known, what remains uncertain, and where the strongest scientific signal sits across a literature set.

02

Judge reliability

Separate stronger evidence from weaker design, narrower claims, or overextended interpretation.

03

Structure one paper deeply

Turn dense articles into reusable, traceable evidence maps for review writing, thesis work, or research planning.

Pricing

Simple public pricing.

Public pricing is kept focused on the three flagship formats. Larger or more specialized work can be scoped separately.

Entry

Structured Evidence Dossier

from €120

Single-paper deep extraction

  • Best first paid format
  • Good for students and early researchers
  • Typical range: €120–€180

Premium

Scientific Landscape Analysis

from €300

Field overview across a literature set

  • Best premium public-facing format
  • Good for broader scientific positioning
  • Typical range: €300–€600
Additional formats are available on request. This includes more specialized or larger-scope analytical work when the question needs something beyond the three flagship formats shown here.

Who this is for

Built for readers who need rigor, not generic summaries.

MSc students

Useful when the challenge is making sense of a literature-heavy topic fast, without losing the scientific structure.

PhD researchers

Useful for review drafting, evidence mapping, methodological comparison, and clearer mechanistic interpretation.

Early-stage biotech and science-facing teams

Useful when literature needs to be turned into something structured, legible, and decision-relevant.

Process

From source material to structured scientific output.

01

Define the question

Clarify the scientific problem, evidence need, and scope of the request.

02

Extract the evidence

Capture study design, models, endpoints, findings, and limitations without inflating the source.

03

Compare and interpret

Map convergence, contradiction, methodological strength, and confidence boundaries.

04

Deliver the output

Present a clear, traceable format that supports review work, analysis, and scientific positioning.

About

Gabriela Uessugui Lopes

I am an MSc Infection Biology student with a BSc in Biomedical Science, focused on infection biology and antimicrobial resistance. My work centers on structured scientific curation for literature-heavy research questions, with an emphasis on clarity, traceability, and rigorous interpretation of existing evidence.

Contact

Need a structured evidence synthesis?

Email me with your topic, paper or paper set, goal, and deadline. I will suggest the best format and scope.